|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2001
   |
Posted - 2015.03.04 20:21:51 -
[1] - Quote
Alp Khan wrote:Mr Omniblivion wrote:Here is a suggestion: CCP needs to actually listen to the nullsec CSM representatives (they are largely disregarding input from CSM reps with Sov changes). Or hire someone that is well versed in nullsec to actually work at CCP. Indeed, they should. I don't think we can name any other game on MMO market that has a developer team with a chronic inability to understand it's player driven dynamics and narratives.
Two things...
First, CSM..I am yet to actually see a swath of stories this time around on how the CSM wasn't consulted or ignored on the proposed changes. In leiu of that we must assume then the bulk of the CSM gave nodding approval to these changes, and their silence now is approval after the fact (or pansied waiting to see which way popular vote blows first...).
Second, CCP obviously isn't trying to ruin the game. They are perhaps just trying to ruin your game.
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2008
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 15:26:11 -
[2] - Quote
What if only dreads or supers could fit the Entosis magic wand module?
- You mirror today's paradigm of SOV cap use without the structure grind, and capitals still get a role to play in SOV warfare. i.e. Why caps now?
- A SOV fight would always involve at least one valuable asset from both sides. An aggressor needs to risk at least one valuable asset, a defender needs to at least field one also to counter-entosis. No cepter' frackery. Delicious IMHO.
What if ISK generation (the heart of EvE IMHO) was nerfed across the board, and net-buffed in null SOV held systems?
- People ask 'why SOV'? I say follow the money. Problem is it might not be compelling right now. Nerf ISK generation across New Eden including hisec, incursions, losec -- every single aspect of isk generation. Then have the SOV held system indices at 'normal' levels of occupancy use yield a net buff to ISK generation in null from current levels.
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2008
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 16:48:50 -
[3] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:125 pages, 2 CSM posts. This shows how little your vote matters. If it had to be any more obvious.
Xenuria for CSM, now more than ever.
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2010
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 20:59:53 -
[4] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:
I am doing my damndest to catch up with this thread. But you lot keep writing faster than I can read. When I am full caught up I will start actual comments and answers but like ISD Ezwal, I am reading it all.
Every damn post.
m
Or...
Instead of reading all the posts happening now and gauging public opinion first as to how to spin what you did in the past, let people know now what your advice to CCP already WAS and to what level the CSM was consulted on this PRIOR to the dev blog announcement?
I think that's where people are disappointed with the CSM right now. We expected you guys to have immediate releases ready to go once the dev blog hit to say "we talked to CCP about this and we said 'X"', BEFORE seeing which way the wind is blowing...
Now you are just going to spin based on what public reaction is now, rather than divulge what your thought leadership with CCP was.
A pox on all of you.
Would you like to know more?
|
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Origin.
Black Legion.
2013
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 22:01:51 -
[5] - Quote
Eli Apol wrote:Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:
I am doing my damndest to catch up with this thread. But you lot keep writing faster than I can read. When I am full caught up I will start actual comments and answers but like ISD Ezwal, I am reading it all.
Every damn post.
m
Or... Instead of reading all the posts happening now and gauging public opinion first as to how to spin what you did in the past, let people know now what your advice to CCP already WAS and to what level the CSM was consulted on this PRIOR to the dev blog announcement? I think that's where people are disappointed with the CSM right now. We expected you guys to have immediate releases ready to go once the dev blog hit to say "we talked to CCP about this and we said 'X"', BEFORE seeing which way the wind is blowing... Now you are just going to spin based on what public reaction is now, rather than divulge what your thought leadership with CCP was. A pox on all of you. Mike Azariah's CSM Candidacy wrote:I am Mike Azariah, Hisec resident...Carebear...Casual player...Northern Troll...Anarchist I have a hunch about how he might have felt about this 
I'm not just singling out mike here. The minutes on sov discussions that were redacted in the minutes must now be released, so the community can weigh 'what value csm', or 'what value csm member X'
Would you like to know more?
|
|
|
| |
|